There is a great deal of difference between Go and Scala. To address criticisms of C, Google created Go, a newer, simpler language. Among its niches are concurrency and Big Data processing, whereas Scala is an older, more mature programming language. There is no doubt that both languages are capable of providing excellent performance for concurrent applications.

An overview of Scala

The Scala programming language aims to express common programming patterns concisely, elegantly, and type-safely. Your programs can be defined in any way you desire, and you are in control of how you describe them.

A functional programming language such as Scheme, Haskell, or Scheme has many features that Java does not. Additionally, it supports functional programming and has a robust static type system. Anonymous functions can be defined in Scala using a lightweight syntax. Among its features are the ability to nest functions and the support for higher-order functions.

There are still some issues with Java compatibility with Scala as it is a very powerful language but hard to learn. As a result of Scala’s better concurrency support, companies such as Twitter have switched to the language. Compared to other languages, Scala has not found a lot of use in the real world due to its academic nature.

Scala’s advantages

The JVM optimizations that have been built over the course of the years are included, and it is compatible with Java. You can build custom DSLs for your libraries using the type system. Any kind of problem can be expressed using this powerful tool.

Scala’s disadvantages

Cloud-native applications inherit JVM issues, such as large container sizes, slow warm-up times, difficulty tuning, and slow deployment. Java compatibility issues, and if Java libraries are required, Scala’s advantages are compromised.

An overview of Go

Google created Go, which is syntactically similar to C. It was designed to increase the parallelism of concurrent programs on multicore machines. Despite being fast to compile, Go has garbage collection and runtime reflection power.

This is suitable for cloud-native applications packaged in containers due to its small and efficient binary size.

Go’s advantages

Compared to interpreted languages, it is a very fast compiler. The small size, no warm-up times, and speed of Go make it a wise choice for cloud-native applications and Kubernetes. You can use it in many different situations: web applications, CLIs, and stream processing, for example. In comparison to the JVM, it uses very little RAM and CPU.

Go’s disadvantages

There are not many libraries or tutorials for Go, as it is a relatively new language. Although Generics will be added to it soon, basic things like them are not available yet. However, dependencies have improved since the addition of go mod, which makes them easier to manage. It is not as elegant, mature, powerful, or flexible as Scala.

Final words

Each has its strengths and weaknesses. For cloud-native applications, GO is the most cost-effective language. But for Big Data and highly concurrent critical systems, Scala is the most suitable choice.